The narrow span of control is an important concept for business leaders to understand. This term refers to the number of direct reports a manager has. In a border aspect, the concept of a narrow span of control refers to an organizational structure in which the number of subordinates or employees under the authority of a single manager is limited. When it comes to organizational structure, having a narrow span of management can offer certain benefits but also present some drawbacks. Throughout this article, we’ll take a closer look at both the advantages and disadvantages of a narrow span of control.
What is a Narrow Span of Control?
A narrow span of control is a management approach where a single supervisor is responsible for overseeing a small team of employees. This type of management structure is commonly used in organizations that have a clear hierarchy e.g. there is a definite chain of command from the top to lower-level of employees.
However, in a narrow span of control, the supervisor is closely involved with the regular activities of the team. Since there are fewer employees to manage, the supervisor can give more attention to each team member and keep a closer look at the work being done.
Advantages of a Narrow Span of Management
There are several advantages to having a narrow span of control in an organization such as More personalized attention, Efficient communication, Accountability, Cohesive work environment, Better oversight and direction, Better training etc. Here are some advantages of having a narrow span of management:
More personalized attention
With a smaller team to manage, the supervisor can provide more individual attention and guidance to each team member. This can help improve job performance and foster a stronger working relationship between the supervisor and employees.
Efficient communication
A narrow span of control can facilitate faster and more direct communication between the supervisor and employees. Therefore, it becomes possible to make quick decisions. A narrow span of management also makes the workflow smoother.
Accountability
In a narrow span of management, the supervisor is more closely involved with the team’s work. As a result, employees feel more accountable for their performance. This sense of accountability can lead to improved productivity and better quality of work.
Cohesive work environment
A narrow span of management can promote a more collaborative and cohesive work environment. With a smaller group to manage, the supervisor can work to create a sense of unity and shared purpose among team members.
Better oversight and direction
One of the key benefits of a narrow span of management is that it allows for better oversight and direction from supervisors. With this type of system, there is a low probability of confusion or miscommunication between different levels of employees. Additionally, it gives supervisors the ability to closely monitor their team’s progress and intervene quickly if needed.
Better training
With a narrow span of control, the supervisor can provide more personalized training and development to each team member. This can help employees acquire new skills and knowledge more efficiently.
Increased job satisfaction
Employees in a narrow span of management may experience greater job satisfaction since they have more direct interaction with their supervisor and a more supportive work environment.
Faster problem-solving
A narrow span of control can facilitate faster problem-solving since the supervisor can be more directly involved in the team’s work and quickly address any issues that arise.
Disadvantages of a Narrow Span of Management
A narrow span of control is not always the best option for an organization. It can create a bottleneck in the decision-making process and limit the ability to quickly and efficiently respond to changes in the market or environment. Additionally, it can lead to micromanagement, which can result in decreased morale among employees. Here are some major disadvantages of a narrow span of management:
No scalability
Having a narrow span of management can make it difficult to scale the organization’s operations. If an organization grows too quickly, the current leadership structure may not be able to handle the increased workload. This can lead to a decrease in productivity, as well as costly errors due to inadequate training.
Higher costs
A narrow span of control also carries with it a number of additional costs. For example, having more supervisors may require more resources, such as additional office space, technology, and salary expenses. Additionally, if the supervisor is not qualified or experienced enough, they will fail to manage their team effectively. This can lead to wasted time and resources while they learn how to properly delegate tasks and monitor progress.
Micromanagement
A narrow span of management sometimes results in micromanagement which can cause a lot of problems including High turnover of staff, no innovation, dependent employees, and employee dissatisfaction.
Limited growth opportunities
With a narrow span of management, there may be limited opportunities for employees to advance within their current team or department.
Lack of diversity
A narrow span of control can limit the diversity of perspectives and ideas within a team, which can inhibit creativity and innovation.
Increased workload
While a narrow span of control can provide more personalized attention, it can also lead to a heavier workload for the supervisor, which can cause burnout and decreased productivity.
How to Determine If a Narrow Span of Management is Right for You
If you’re considering implementing a narrow span of control in your business, it’s important to evaluate the potential benefits and drawbacks. Consider the size of your business, the type of tasks that need to be delegated, and the availability of personnel when making a decision.
When evaluating if a narrow span of management is right for you, it’s important to consider how well it will fit into the organizational structure. Will the implementation of this management style create a better workflow and ensure that employees have clear roles and responsibilities? Additionally, will implementing a narrow span of control reduce costs or increase productivity?
Another factor to consider is the ability of supervisors and managers to handle the extra responsibility. With fewer employees to manage, supervisors will have more responsibilities and will likely have to take on more tasks. Are supervisors equipped to handle the increased workload? Do they have the skills and experience needed? If not, what resources can you provide to help them manage the extra responsibility?
Finally, you must consider the availability of personnel. Will there be enough people to supervise when implementing a narrow span of management? If not, are there ways to adjust the number of supervisors without compromising quality?
Ultimately, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer to determining if a narrow span of control is right for your business. However, taking these factors into account can help you make an informed decision that is best for your organization.
Conclusion
In conclusion, a narrow span of control can have several advantages for organizations with small teams, such as more personalized attention, efficient communication, accountability, and a cohesive work environment. However, it’s important to also consider the potential disadvantages of a narrow span of management, including limited growth opportunities, overdependence on the supervisor, lack of diversity, micromanagement, and increased workload.
Overall, the decision to implement a narrow span of control as a management approach depends on a variety of factors, for example, the size of the organization and the specific needs and goals of the team. By carefully weighing the advantages and disadvantages, organizations can determine if a narrow span of management is the best approach for their unique circumstances.
Comments